Greenhouse gas reductions: US regulates oil and gas sector (despite Prime Minister’s claims yesterday), but not Canada

Greenhouse gas reductions: US regulates oil and gas sector (despite Prime Minister’s claims yesterday), but not Canada

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Prime Minister said that no other country is regulating oil and gas, but a briefing note from Environment Canada explains that, in fact, the United States is already regulating oil and gas. It said:

For oil and gas, recent air pollution regulations are expected to result in significant greenhouse gas reductions.

Did the Minister of the Environment ever read that briefing note?

Mr. Colin Carrie (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment, CPC): Mr. Speaker, when we talk about greenhouse gas emissions going down, it is our party, and the numbers speak for themselves. Between 2005 and 2012, greenhouse gases in Canada went down 5.1% while our economy grew 10.6%. This is a big difference between our party and the irresponsible policies of the NDP and the Liberals.

We want to work together and collaboratively with the United States to make sure that we have a sector-by-sector approach that works on a continental basis. We are going to do that without a job-killing carbon tax.

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister thinks that there should be a continental-wide regulatory system for oil and gas. Given that he used that as an excuse for Conservative inaction, can the Minister of the Environment tell us about any proposals that she has given to the Americans for such a regulatory system? Where are these proposals, or are they just made up as well?

Mr. Colin Carrie (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of the Environment, CPC): Mr. Speaker, we are very proud of our record. Internationally, we are a founding member of the Climate and Clean Air Coalition. We have made significant investments to help support green energy and infrastructure internationally. We have one of the cleanest systems in the world. We have already regulated the transportation and electricity sectors, and we are planning to reduce HFCs, one of the fastest-growing greenhouse gases in the entire world.

Thanks to our actions, carbon emissions will go down close to 130 megatonnes from what they would have been under the Liberals, and we have done it all without a carbon tax.

 



Question Period: Twenty-five years after École Polytechnique, gender-based violence still persists

Question Period: Twenty-five years after École Polytechnique, gender-based violence still persists

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, on December 6, 25 years ago, 14 women were killed at École Polytechnique. These women were killed because they were women. I know that all of our thoughts are with the families of those women, but we must also commit ourselves to action. Twenty five years later violence is still targeted at women because of gender. Will the government commit to working together with the NDP and our action plan to end violence against women?

Hon. K. Kellie Leitch (Minister of Labour and Minister of Status of Women, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the massacre at École Polytechnique in Montreal was a Canadian tragedy. This week we remember the crimes that took place 25 years ago. While I would never think we could make sense of why those crimes took place that day, we must continue to ensure this never happens again in Canada. Our government will continue to stay focused on supporting the victims of these crimes, as well as punishing the criminals who commit these heinous crimes.

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the tragic murder of Zahra Abdille and her children shows how our system fails women fleeing violence. Women like Ms. Abdille need support, like legal aid and housing.

A Canadian Bar Association report said:

…victims of domestic violence are among the most vulnerable in society and require access to legal and other services … to protect themselves and their children.

What measures is the government taking to improve access to legal aid and housing for women fleeing violence?

Hon. K. Kellie Leitch (Minister of Labour and Minister of Status of Women, CPC): Mr. Speaker, our government has been committed to preventing violent crimes and violence against women and girls.

Let me list some of the things we have done, and I would encourage the members opposite to participate in supporting these initiatives: the victims’ bills of rights act; the creation of a DNA based missing persons index; passing new laws to protect victims who have been harassed by those who have committed crimes against them; eliminating pardons for serious crimes; and better protecting youth from adult sexual predators.

This is a few of many initiatives this government has taken. I am very proud of that record of supporting victims and putting criminals behind bars. 






Question to Status of Women Minister: Will you support NDP motion to end violence against women?; Answer: …?

Question to Status of Women Minister: Will you support NDP motion to end violence against women?; Answer: …?

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, the evidence is very thin on that action.

What we do need are serious policy initiatives and programs to support women fleeing violence at home and in their communities, to create a culture where women will feel unafraid to report sexual violence, to stop the tragedy of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls, and to eliminate the inequalities that make women more vulnerable to gender violence.

Will the minister commit today, we are asking again, to addressing gender inequality in Canada, and support the motion by member for Churchill for a national action plan to end violence against women?

Hon. K. Kellie Leitch (Minister of Labour and Minister of Status of Women, CPC): Mr. Speaker, let me start by talking about the things this government has done and that the opposition has not supported.

There is the victims bill of rights, a DNA-based missing persons index, new laws to protect victims from being harassed by those who have committed the crimes against them. We have eliminated pardons for serious crimes. We have provided better protection for, particularly, young women who have been victims of sexual predators.

I ask the opposition: We are acting, why are they not supporting us? Why are they voting against all of these initiatives?




Top