NDP: FOOD BANK USE HIGHER UNDER CONSERVATIVES

NDP: FOOD BANK USE HIGHER UNDER CONSERVATIVES

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

November 5, 2013

OTTAWA – Five years after the recession the Conservatives have failed to revive the economy and the number of Canadians relying on food banks remains higher than pre-2008 figures.

Food Banks Canada’s latest report indicates that Canadians’ food bank use is 23 per cent higher than before the recession began in 2008.  Worse yet, over 30 per cent of food bank users are children and 11 per cent are Indigenous people.

“Canadians are paying the price for the Conservatives’ failure to create quality well-paid jobs,” said NDP Employment and Social Development critic Jinny Sims (Newton – North Delta). “New Democrats believe that no one should have to choose between paying the rent and buying food. The Conservatives must take steps to address food insecurity.”


Racial Profiling

Racial Profiling

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Not only are border communities facing enormous difficulties, but individual Canadians are facing harassment, racial profiling registration and now the new visa requirements by the U.S. Even Canadian citizens who cross the border daily to go to work in the U.S. are facing interrogation when they return by Canadian officials no less.

I want to ask the Prime Minister: Why is the Canadian government not standing up for the rights of these Canadians and making it clear that we will not tolerate state-sanctioned racial profiling and harassment of Canadian citizens and permanent residents?

Hon. Bill Graham (Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as the Minister of National Revenue pointed out, these are stressful times. The point is that we work in stressful times together with our American colleagues to solve these problems. At every level of government, whether it is the Deputy Prime Minister and Secretary Ridge, Secretary Powell and myself, or any other of our counterparts, every minister in the government works with his or her counterpart in the American administration. We are reducing delays. We are reducing friction at the border. We have the best relationship with the American government than any other country in the world. We will continue to work on that and we will assure it for the benefit of Canadians.


Statement in Memoriam of Charlie Quan – Libby Davies

 

Statement in Memoriam of Charlie Quan

[[{“type”:”media”,”view_mode”:”media_large”,”fid”:”144″,”attributes”:{“alt”:””,”class”:”media-image”,”typeof”:”foaf:Image”}}]]

 

House of Commons

 

HANSARD

 

March 9, 2012

 

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP):

 

Mr. Speaker, I am honoured to rise today to pay tribute to a remarkable Canadian, Charlie Quan, who died February 23 at the age of 105.

 

Mr. Quan was one of the oldest living head tax payers in Canada and for many years fought for justice and redress from the unjust and racist head tax and Chinese Exclusion Act that separated him from his family.

 

He paid the $500 head tax in 1923 but it took until 2006 for the Government of Canada to issue a formal apology.

 

I had the honour to meet Mr. Quan, who was my constituent, and know that his perseverance inspired younger generations to keep advocating for justice. This struggle still goes on today for the many families who have not yet received compensation and justice.

 

Mr. Quan was an honourable gentleman, who only ever wanted the right thing to be done: for us all to learn from history to ensure these injustices are not repeated against any people or group.

 

I hope all parliamentarians and governments will honour his memory and work to end racism, discrimination and injustice.

 

I offer my deepest condolences to his family.



Libby speaks in support of more palliative care services – Libby Davies

 

Libby speaks in support of more palliative care services

House of Commons

HANSARD

April 1, 2014

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP):

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to rise in the House today to support my colleague, the member for Timmins—James Bay, and this great motion that he has brought before the House.

It is a simple and straightforward motion, but it is incredibly important. As the member outlined, it is really about establishing a pan-Canadian palliative care, end-of-life care strategy. It is about providing more support for caregivers, improving the quality and consistency of home and hospice, palliative, end-of-life care, and actually encouraging Canadians to discuss this issue.

When we look at our health care system, sometimes we think that things do not affect us. However, I think it is very true to say that we have all had experiences where a family member, a close friend or maybe a neighbour has been in the situation where they are approaching the end of their life, and it becomes a real struggle in terms of where they might be and what kind of care they might receive.

Palliative care and end-of-life care, whether it is in a hospice or at home, is something that is really very deep. It is very meaningful. For many years, we did not talk about these issues. We do not like to talk about death. We do not like to think about what happens to us at the end.

However, it is something we should talk about. More than that, it is something that we need to have public policy around. I think that is why this motion is so important. It does show us that across the country there are incredible examples of palliative care.

It is very patchy. For example, in my community in East Vancouver, the St. James Cottage Hospice, which is located in an historic building in Burrard View Park, is an amazing place. It is like a home. It is a place where people feel comfortable. It is where they have dignity. They do tremendous work.

Every year in our community, in East Vancouver, there is a festival of lights. The houses are dressed up with Christmas lights, and people vote and give donations, on the street adjacent to the palliative care home. The money goes to palliative care. It is the whole community coming together to express itself. It is a very wonderful initiative that is being taken undertaken.

What I think we need to state in this debate is that, unfortunately, there are big gaps in the system. I was very proud last Monday when the NDP unveiled a very important document based on 18 months of consultation across the country about health care in this country.

We actually did go out and talk to Canadians. We did our homework about what needs to be done to improve and sustain our public health care system. It is a wonderful document, and I would certainly urge people to go check it out on the NDP website.

In the public forums and the consultations that we held across the country, one of the key issues that came forward from people based on their own experience, their own need about what they know needs to happen was the fact that we need better home, long-term and palliative care. It came through to us again and again.

I would just like to quote from our document that we just put out a week ago.

Canadians want to see home care, long term care, and palliative care recognized as essential medical services just like treatment in the hospital. These services are not luxuries, and they need to be fully accessible, whatever a patient’s income, and provided at the same high quality and standards wherever they live.

That quote has come to us in our document because of what people told us. We are very cognizant of the fact that palliative care is part of a bigger issue that needs to be critically addressed in this country, and that is the issue of continuing care of which palliative care is a part.

We do need to have home care. We do need to have long-term care. Again, it is very spotty across the country. Some provinces do well, others do not. People who live in smaller and remote communities have very little access.

So the reliance that we have on acute care facilities, the over-reliance because there is nowhere else to go for people to end up in hospital, as the member for Timmins—James Bay pointed out. For people to die with dignity, they need to be in an appropriate place where there is support, resources, the right kind of medication to relieve pain, the right kind of guidance, whether it be spiritual or emotional, for their family.

These are probably the most important times in anybody’s life, yet it really does not exist across the country in the way it should.

I really want to make the point today that in debating this motion, let us recognize that it is linked to a bigger issue around our health care system and that we have to make sure that the federal government shows leadership on this issue.

There are many reforms needed in our health care system. This is one of them. Today, I met with a group, the Parkinson’s Association. I have met with many other groups. They all say the same thing, which is that the difficulty, the burdens financially and sometimes emotionally of caregiving and what that places on the family where people have to leave work, quit their jobs, take out loans creates an enormous stress and burden.

This is not what should be happening. There are incredible groups out there who have been calling for this kind of pan-Canadian end-of-life care strategy for so long. I think it is fantastic that we had an all-party parliamentary committee working on this issue.

Now is the time that we are actually having this debate. We have our own power here to vote, one by one. We have the power to say that this motion has merit, it is legitimate and it has all of this groundwork, all of this homework that has been done. It is non-partisan. It crosses all political lines. We have this opportunity in this House to vote for this motion and to actually say to the government that this is the will of Parliament.

It is based on what we hear from our constituents. It might be based on our own experience. I certainly have my own experience. My partner of 24 years died of cancer just before I was elected. We were very fortunate that we had palliative care at home under the B.C. health care system.

I cannot imagine what that experience, as hard as it was, would have been like if my partner had been in a hospital, just in a ward or maybe in the hallway. Being at home and having people around him who loved him and cared for him on a daily basis and having the professional help and support that we needed was critical to how we went through our own process of grieving and losing someone that we loved so much.

That is just my experience, and this is manifest by hundreds of thousands of people across the country every day, so I want to say, let us pay attention to the motion. Let us look at how it is putting something forward that is real and legitimate. Let us put aside partisanship. Let us recognize the good work that has been done on this issue by an all-party committee. Let us unite, come together and say to the government that we want to pass this motion and we do want the Government of Canada to establish a pan-Canadian palliative care strategy.

I would also like to move an amendment. I move,

That the motion be amended by replacing the words “Canada (b) respects the cultural, spiritual and familial needs of Canada’s first nation, Inuit and Métis people” with the words “Canada, as well as Canada’s first nation, Inuit and Métis people (b) respects the cultural, spiritual and familial needs of all Canadians”.

 



NEW DEMOCRATS LAUNCH CAMPAIGN TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF CONTINUING CARE

NEW DEMOCRATS LAUNCH CAMPAIGN TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF CONTINUING CARE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

October 31, 2013

NEW DEMOCRATS LAUNCH CAMPAIGN TO IMPROVE QUALITY OF CONTINUING CARE

OTTAWA – New Democrats will introduce legislation today to improve the quality of continuing care beyond the treatment of hospitals.

“Across this country we are seeing the growing gaps in continuing care between rural and urban, rich and poor” said NDP Health critic Libby Davies (Vancouver East).

“It is unacceptable that quality of life is being undermined because the federal government is disinterested in maintaining a national vision for health care and senior support” said Davies. “Improving palliative care cannot happen without greater changes to the health care system and attention to how resources are allocated.”

As well as Davies’ Private Member’s Bill on continuing care, MP Charlie Angus (Timmins-James Bay) introduced a Private Member’s Motion that would establish a national strategy on palliative care.

“Only 16 to 30% of Canadians have access to quality end of life care. There are huge disparities in access and service across this country. I challenge the Harper government to join the conversation on the need for quality palliative home and hospice care for Canadians” said Angus.

 

Check out the full details on Libby’s bill on home, long-term, and palliative care:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/content/hoc/Bills/412/Private/C-545/C-545_1/C-545_1.PDF

 

Charlie Angus’ motion on palliative care:

M-456 — October 21, 2013 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should establish a Pan-Canadian Palliative and End-of-life Care Strategy by working with provinces and territories on a flexible, integrated model of palliative care that: (a) takes into account the geographic, regional, and cultural diversity of urban and rural Canada; (b) respects the cultural, spiritual and familial needs of Canada’s First Nation, Inuit and Métis people; and (c) has the goal of (i) ensuring all Canadians have access to high quality home-based and hospice palliative end-of-life care, (ii) providing more support for caregivers, (iii) improving the quality and consistency of home and hospice palliative end-of-life care in Canada, (iv) encouraging Canadians to discuss and plan for end-of-life care.Pursuant to Standing Order 86(3), jointly seconded by:Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River) — October 24, 2013Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — October 30, 2013


NDP MPs Libby Davies and Charlie Angus introduce bill to improve end-of-life care

NDP MPs Libby Davies and Charlie Angus introduce bill to improve end-of-life care

The NDP Thursday called for a national framework to improve the quality of end-of-life care in Canada. Libby Davies, the NDP’s health critic and MP for Vancouver East, introduced a private member’s bill in the House of Commons calling for a co-ordinated, national response to continuing care. The bill was seconded by Charlie Angus, ethics critic and MP for Timmins-James Bay, who added a motion to establish a national strategy on palliative care specifically. “We know that many, many Canadians are falling through the cracks, we know that there’s not enough home care, long-term care or palliative care to meet the current demand in Canada,” Davies said.



Forum focuses on health-care solutions

Forum focuses on health-care solutions

Linked to NDP caucus meetings held in St. John’s this week, the official opposition in Ottawa hosted a public forum on health care Thursday evening in St. John’s looking at the system’s future in Canada. According to NDP health critic Libby Davies, her party’s goal is to make sure Canadians’ priorities are also government priorities when it comes to health care. In her estimation, the governing Conservative Party is not doing its job on that front.


Top