DILUTED DRUGS: HEALTH CANADA KNEW ABOUT GAPS IN OVERSIGHT

DILUTED DRUGS: HEALTH CANADA KNEW ABOUT GAPS IN OVERSIGHT

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 15, 2013

OTTAWA – With recent confirmation that Health Canada rebuffed oversight meeting requests from a chemotherapy drug supplier, and then attempted to blame the provinces, the NDP is asking the Conservatives to stop playing with Canadians’ lives and take action.

 “Drug safety is unequivocally a federal responsibility. When we asked the Minister about this issue in the House she said the drug supplier had never applied for federal regulatory approval,” said Health Critic Libby Davies (Vancouver-East). “These e-mails show that Health Canada failed in its responsibility to protect the Canadian drug supply and it is utterly irresponsible for the Minister of Health to abdicate her responsibility and put Canadian lives at risk.”

Marchese Hospital Solutions supplies intravenous cancer drugs to hospitals. The company repeatedly approached the Ministry of Health in 2011 seeking guidance but no meeting was granted. Following reports that over 1,200 cancer patients in New Brunswick and Ontario had received diluted chemotherapy drugs it was revealed that another supplier had been in operation for nearly 30 years with zero action from Health officials to ensure supply quality.

“It is absolutely unacceptable that drug mixing companies have been operating unregulated for so many years,” said Deputy Critic Djaouida Sellah (Saint-Bruno-Saint-Hubert). “It is unacceptable that a Minister who has been in charge of this file since 2008 has taken no action to fix this problem.”



FEDERAL LEADERSHIP OVERDUE ON LONG-TERM CARE: NDP

FEDERAL LEADERSHIP OVERDUE ON LONG-TERM CARE: NDP

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 14, 2013

OTTAWA – With a recent Toronto hospice closure highlighting the critical state of palliative and long-term care, the NDP is urging the federal government to address the lack of resources and coordination for this type of care.

“This critical shortage of beds and lack of funding for palliative care is a direct result of the Conservative government’s failure to make health care for Canadians a priority,” said NDP Health critic Libby Davies (Vancouver East). “Instead of hiding in Ottawa, the Health minister should work with the provinces to ensure that Canadians get the essential health services they need.”

Residential hospices provide an important option for Canadians with terminal illness who need 24-hour medical care. Perram House was one of only three residential hospices in Toronto. Its closure means there are now just twenty hospice beds for a city of 2.6 million people. And even though hospice care is less costly than staying in hospital, it receives limited government funding and these facilities must rely on their own fundraising efforts to stay open.

“This is yet another example of Conservatives walking away from their responsibilities and passing the burden of funding important services to the provinces and territories,” said NDP MP Matthew Kellway (Beaches – East York). “Every person deserves to die with dignity and our first class health system should make that possible.”


Libby & the NDP speak to your concerns in Parliament! – Libby Davies

 

Libby & the NDP speak to your concerns in Parliament!

A charitable organization that studies Canada’s democracy wants to get tongues wagging on the Hill by talking about, well, talking. In honour of the summer reading season, Samara studied how much MPs and parties spoke in the House of Commons in 2012 and matched some members up with notable works of Canadian literature…The NDP, with 33 per cent of the MPs, spoke the most of any party at 44 per cent. Five of the top ten spots of most talkative members were New Democrats…Top ten most-talkative MPs: 1. Peter Julian, Burnaby—New Westminster (NDP) = 226,027 words 5. Jack Harris, St. John’s East (NDP) = 113,819 words 8. Libby Davies, Vancouver East (NDP) = 85,689 words 9. Don Davies, Vancouver Kingsway (NDP) = 85,360 words 10. Jinny Sims, Newton—North Delta (NDP) = 82,770 words


Guest Blog by Dr. Norm Campbell: Bill C-460 Struck Down: A Big Loss for Canadian Health

Guest Blog by Dr. Norm Campbell: Bill C-460 Struck Down: A Big Loss for Canadian Health

 

The chamber of the House of Commons is shown during Question Period Wednesday March 27, 2013 in Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld

Canadians now face and seem to accept worse health, more disability and higher health costs on Canada Health Day.

It is ironic that in advance of Canada Health Day (May 12th) – a day to honor and celebrate public health initiatives that help keep Canadians healthy – that the Federal Government defeated  Bill C-460 in parliament on Tuesday.

If passed, Bill C-460 would have implemented an effective sodium reduction strategy, projected to save 10s of thousands of Canadian lives and hospitalizations per year and prevent hypertension in more than 2 million. In addition it was projected to save billions in health care spending per year and was a key stepping stone to a sustainable health care system.  The bill was supported directly by 60 health care professional, scientific and charitable organizations. Over 80% of Canadians also supported the approach proposed in Bill C-460 for
effective sodium reduction.

The Premiers of the Canadian Provinces and Territories have advocated for the Federal government to take action to effectively reduce dietary sodium.   In parliament, the bill was supported by all members of the NDP, Liberal, Bloc Québécois, as well as Ms Elizabeth May (Green Party) and Mr. Bruce Hyer (Independent) and Mr. Maurice Vellacott (Conservative Party). The Conservative Party members on mass otherwise voted against the expressed interests and wishes of Canadians, against a bill that would promote health, help structure a sustainable health care system and save money.    Several members of the Conservative Party issued misleading statements about the bill in the led up to the vote.

There are three options for Canadians.

The first is to accept that we will have less healthy lives with more premature death and disability and that more and more of our tax dollars will be spent on the health care system.

The second is for individual Canadians to become more politically active and express their views on health to their Federal elected representatives (this appears to be only necessary for Conservative representatives) and ask them to take clear effective actions supported by the scientific and health care expert community.  The opportunity for change prior to the next election is clearly in the hands of the Conservative party now that they have defeated Bill C-460.

The third is to ensure that in the next election that Federal candidates clearly understand the wishes of Canadians for improved health and a sustainable health care system. With unhealthy diet being the leading risk for death, disability andlife years lost in Canada and the food supply being primarily a federal mandate, this means taking appropriate regulatory actions to ensure a healthy food supply.

Prior to the last election the Conservative party supported an effective sodium reduction strategy however after achieving a majority it is clear they currently do not.

If Canadians care, they should make their concerns heard.

Take Action: Let your MP know how you feel about their vote.

Click here to see how your MP voted on Bill C-460.

Click below to find contact information for your Canadian Federal MP. Just enter your postal code:

http://www.parl.gc.ca/Parlinfo/Compilations/HouseOfCommons/MemberByPostalCode.aspx?Menu=HOC

Dr. Norm Campbell is a Professor of Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Physiology and Pharmacology, the University of Calgary, Canada, and the Heart
and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR) Chair in Hypertension Prevention and Control.  He is also the co-Chair, PAHO-WHO Technical Advisory Group to mobilize cardiovascular disease prevention through dietary salt control policies and interventions.

This blog was originally posted at Hypertension Talk: http://www.hypertensiontalk.com/


Statement on Missing Women Murder Trial

Statement on Missing Women Murder Trial

VANCOUVER – The tragedy of the missing women from Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside will generate enormous media attention as the trial begins January 22, 2007. As the Member of Parliament representing Vancouver East (including the Downtown Eastside), I want to express my support and sympathy to the families and friends of the missing women who continue to grieve and be exposed to the violent and horrifying experience of what happened to these women.

The tragedy of this situation is far reaching. For many in the Downtown Eastside and beyond there is a sense of loss and grief as people face the enormity of what has taken place. It raises many troubling questions about our society and about why these women were so at risk and vulnerable to violence, exploitation and death, and why so many sex workers continue to be at risk today.

The disappearance of more that sixty women from the Downtown Eastside and hundreds more from across the country, also raises deeply disturbing questions about Canada’s justice system and how it failed. Despite the recent media attention to Vancouver’s missing women, no significant changes have been made, at any level of government, to protect sex workers, who remain at risk.

I will continue to call for law reform, immediate support for exit strategies, and the need for a public inquiry, to ensure that necessary changes are made at all levels of government, to best protect the rights and safety of sex workers and affected communities.

Current laws around prostitution make street level sex workers vulnerable to selective law enforcement as well as exploitation and violence. Survival sex workers are often poor and drug dependent, and are reluctant to seek protection under the law.

Cuts in social programs and spending, together with increasing poverty, particularly over the past decade, have forced more women into survival sex trade.

The Parliamentary Committee on Justice and Human Rights recently completed its report on prostitution laws, The Challenge of Change: a Study of Canada’s Criminal Prostitution Laws. The Committee began its work October 2, 2003 as a result of my motion unanimously adopted in Parliament to review prostitution laws to improve the safety of sex trade workers and the community in general, and to make recommendations to reduce the exploitation and violence against sex trade workers.

The report outlines the failure of the criminal code to protect sex workers and local communities. When sex workers are displaced to isolated areas as a result of the communicating law, they face greater risk for harm and death and become easier targets for predators.

There was near unanimous agreement from witnesses heard at the committee that the current status and regime of law enforcement pertaining to prostitution is unworkable, contradictory and unacceptable. It has created an environment of marginalization and violence, with negative impacts on both sex workers and affected local communities.

Sex workers are fearful to report violence, assault and coercion because of their illegal status. Their poor relationship with law enforcement authorities, contributes to the danger they face. Better training of law enforcement agencies is needed.

I believe the federal government must come to terms with the contradictions and impossibility of the status quo, and engage in a process of law reform that will lead to the decriminalization of laws pertaining to prostitution and focus criminal sanctions on harmful situations.

It is also critical for all levels of government to immediately improve the safety of sex workers and assist them to exit the sex trade if they are not there by choice, by providing significant resources for poverty alleviation and income support, education and training, and treatment for addictions.

In February 2002, I called on the Mayor of Vancouver, as Chair of the Vancouver Police Board, to support an inquiry into the police investigation of the missing women to determine what happened. This public inquiry still needs to happen.





Libby speaking out on censorship

Libby speaking out on censorship

The fallout from the blocking of three gay films at the border has reverberated across Parliament Hill. Queer MPs are universally outraged by what they see as a return to the era of Little Sister's struggles. "How long does this battle have to go on?" asks NDP House Leader Libby Davies. "There's been thousands, maybe millions of dollars spent on litigation [and] court battles by Little Sister's. Why are they holding up material that is totally acceptable?"


Top