Blog – Libby Davies yeehaw

In Washington DC Supporting TroopsHomeFast

In Washington DC Supporting TroopsHomeFast

WASHINGTON, DC- Over the past 2 days I have had the privilege to be involved in an anti-war hunger strike action, organized by CODEPINK, a major women’s peace group in the US. The action, TroopsHomeFast, has had broad support since it began July 4, calling for the immediate withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.

Long term fasters (now in day 24) have been in front of the White House, drawing attention to the illegal occupation of US forces in Iraq and the deadly cost to civilian, Iraqi, and US lives.

On my first day, I joined the action on the afternoon the Prime Minister of Iraq visited Washington, DC, and was able to participate in a press conference across the street from the Iraqi Embassy. Outside the Embassy, CODEPINK organizers called for a meeting with Prime Minister Al-Maliki, urging him to listen to the Iraqi people, not George Bush, and support the Iraqi reconciliation plan to end the occupation and withdraw the US troops.

After discussions on the street outside the Embassy, representatives of the Embassy said they would deliver the groups letter to the PM, requesting a meeting.

On day 2, I spoke with fasters in Lafayette Park adjacent to the White House, and delivered a message of solidarity from Vancouver’s StopWar.ca in front of the White House with a megaphone, as Bush and Al-Maliki held a press conference on the other side of the iron fence on the lawn of the White House. Tourists and passers-by clapped when I said I was a Canadian Member of Parliament, in DC to support the TroopsHomeFast action.

Later in the day we returned to the Iraqi Embassy, and set up chairs and banners on the street, awaiting the arrival of the Iraqi PM to press the demand for a meeting. CODEPINK supporters made a wonderful colourful impact, with pink banners, pink umbrellas, their trademark pink t-shirts, pink bags, and leaflets. Cindy Sheehan, a key US peace activist, and part of the CODEPINK contingent, sat calmly in front of the Embassy, ready, along with others, to be arrested for refusing to move after 3 warnings from police.

Intense negotiations with Washington DC police who were on the scene, resulted in agreement that the anti war activists would move to the end of the block (now cordoned off by police and teeming with Secret Service personnel in dark glasses), on the basis that representatives of the Iraqi Embassy would allow Cindy Sheehan and Medea Benjamin (organizer of CODEPINK and TroopsHomeFast) to go into a reception being held for the PM at the Embassy. As expected they were not allowed in, but resolved to return the next day.

It is wonderful to see the level of commitment, organization and detail of these American peace activists. They are so appreciative of support from Canada. They have a daunting task here in the US, and it’s not easy to get media coverage. But they do have strong cross-sector support. I have met a retired US Army Colonel, a US soldier representing, Iraq Veterans Against the War, a high school student, raging grannies, and many more.

CODEPINK displays a marvellous tenacity, that is creative and bold, and it is inspiring to see them in action.

Of course we have a massive job to do in Canada too, to defeat Harper’s drive to support Bush’s illegal and immoral wars. In that way, we need to develop stronger solidarity between US and Canadian peace activists, as shown at the World Peace Forum held in Vancouver in June.

I will return home with a stronger resolve to work with likeminded people to oppose military aggression and war, and the oppression and denial of Human Rights.


Calling for Federal Permit Renewal for Successful Safe Injection Facility

Calling for Federal Permit Renewal for Successful Safe Injection Facility

North America’s first Safe Injection Site could be in jeopardy. InSite began as a three-year study in September of 2003, and legally operates due to an exemption by Health Canada under Section 56 of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. If the federal Minister of Health, Tony Clement, does not renew this exemption, the facility will shut down as of September 12, 2006. This would create a destabilizing and harmful impact, as InSite has proven to be successful in reducing the harm associated with drug use, and improving community safety and health in the Downtown Eastside.

The evidence of InSite’s success in reducing harm speaks for itself. This program has led to an increase in drug users entering detoxification programs and addiction treatment (New England Journal of Medicine), has attracted the highest risk users most vulnerable to HIV infection (American Journal of Preventative Medicine), and most importantly, an estimated 453 drug overdoses has resulted in zero fatalities thanks to the expertise of health professionals at the facility. On the issue of crime, InSite has not led to increases in drug trafficking, assaults, or robbery, and has seen a decline in vehicle break-ins and theft (Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy). It has also reduced public injections and syringe disposals, improving the overall public order for the community as a whole (Canadian Medical Association Journal).

InSite is part of the city of Vancouver’s comprehensive “Four Pillars” Drug Strategy: harm reduction, prevention, treatment, and enforcement. Many prominent individuals and groups have come out in support of this program, including Mayor Sam Sullivan, Senator Larry Campbell, the Vancouver Chinatown Merchants Association, and the Chief Constable of the City of Vancouver Police Department.

As the evidence on InSite’s success continues to grow, more and more people from across Vancouver, and indeed, across Canada, are realizing the benefits of this harm reduction program, and in many cases, demanding similar programs in their own communities. InSite has proven to be an essential tool for saving lives, reducing disease and crime, and improving the overall community in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. I urge the Health Minister to look at the evidence and ensure this program is continued. If this facility is shut down, it will have a serious negative impact on the community and local businesses. I call on the Minister to make the right decision, and renew the exemption so that Insite can continue to help the people of Vancouver deal with the problems associated with drug use.




Libby speaking out agains the Conservative’s so-called drug policy

Libby speaking out agains the Conservative’s so-called drug policy

When you look beyond the paternalism, cynicism, genuine concern — whatever motives drive the Harper government's punitive approach to crime — only one question matters. Is it effective? Will closing Vancouver's safe injection site, Insite, reduce drug addiction and related crime? Will imposing six-month minimum jail sentences on anyone caught with as few as five marijuana plants inhibit pot-smoking among teenagers? Will expanding prisons reduce violence in our streets? Most legal experts, criminologists, addiction researchers and street-level health workers, along with many police chiefs and past reports from Parliamentary committees, say "no" — as does the experience of other "tough-on-crime" jurisdictions. …As New Democrat Libby Davies noted: "What they are doing is not based on evidence, whatsoever. It's a political stance."



Health care’s improving in Canada: report

Health care’s improving in Canada: report

OTTAWA – Pumping more cash into the health-care system won’t fix it without better planning and clear goals, the Health Council of Canada said Tuesday. Its latest report card on the health accords struck by the feds and the provinces in 2003 and 2004 indicates gains made in the past seven years can be tied directly to governments setting specific targets and following through on those commitments…NDP health critic Libby Davies is encouraged by gains highlighted in the report, but says the Conservatives have dropped the ball on pharmacare. “The glaring issue is the lack of leadership and participation of the federal government,” she said.


Employment Equity

Employment Equity

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): – Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to speak in the House today on behalf of the New Democrats in response to the minister’s comments as a result of the tabling of the Employment Equity Act annual report. This is the 20th anniversary of this important legislation. We have learned that diversity in the workplace makes us strong.

I agree with other members who have said that to have legislation that lays out clear objectives and goals to ensure that the federal government is a major employer but also a federally regulated employer are actually meeting obligations for employment equity but diversity in the workplace is something that is important. It is not just something that can be done on a voluntary basis through goodwill. It has to be an established practice with rules, regulations and consequences. That has basically been what the Employment Equity Act has been about.

I was fortunate to participate in the previous five year review at the HRSDC committee. It was an interesting process and I learned a lot of things. One thing I learned is that, in actual fact, some of the private sector employers have done very well, like banks and airlines, because they have actually recognized from a business point of view the importance of having diversity in the workplace. Having women, visible minorities, aboriginal people, and persons with disabilities in the workplace actually provides them with a better capacity to serve a diverse population, their own clientele. It was quite remarkable to see that large, federally regulated employers were making great advances.

Advances have also been made by the federal government in its very strict requirements about meeting obligations. However, a lot of work still needs to be done. This issue requires constant education within the workplace. There are still barriers, stereotypes and things that discriminate against visible minorities, women, persons with disabilities and aboriginal people. We must be constantly vigilant. It cannot just be an annual report. We need a process within the workplace to deal with systemic discrimination and the barriers that exist.

I would point out that there are some things that are very concerning. For example, as a result of some studies we know that approximately 25% of applications to the federal government are from visible minorities. However, the appointment rate is at about 10%. We also know that the number of minorities who leave is much higher.

There are some real issues in terms of what happens, one, in terms of people being hired and that barriers still exist and, two, what happens to people once they are within the public service with regard to promotions and discrimination that may not be overt but which is what we consider to be systemic discrimination.

The other thing that will be very critical in this review is to ensure there is a meaningful role and dialogue with unions that represent their members in the workplace. This was an issue in the last five year review. PSAC and other unions are dedicated and committed to employment equity and it is important to ensure they are fully involved in this review, in this process and in the ongoing practice of the implementation and enforcement of this act.

Employment equity, in its broadest terms, also deals with the issue of pay equity. I would note for the minister that we are still waiting to see the long awaited pay equity legislation. We know a report was tabled two years ago. This is a huge issue for women within the public service and women generally. We want to ensure the pay equity report is implemented by way of legislation because it is a critical component of employment equity.

Finally, in a broad policy context, as the member from the Bloc raised, if we want to talk about women’s participation in the workforce, we need to address the issues of what it means to face a lack of child care accessibility and extraordinarily high child care costs.

We cannot divorce these issues. They are integral to the equality of women in our country. They are integral to employment equity. If our workplace is to be truly diverse and represent a qualified work pool, then we have to provide the resources and the supports that allow women to fully participate in the workforce.

Those are just some of the issues that we would flag. We are glad the report has been tabled. We look forward to the review at the committee and we will participate fully in it. We hope to strengthen and improve the federal government’s employment equity act and make it a real tool of leadership that employers can follow to ensure there is fairness, justice and equity in the workplace.




Top