Libby on Prorogation and Parliament

Libby on Prorogation and Parliament

The opposition House leaders are warning Prime Minister Stephen Harper that he shouldn't take their cooperation for granted in the next session and say his government has "soured" the atmosphere in the Commons by proroguing Parliament. "It will be quite tense," said NDP House Leader Libby Davies (Vancouver East, B.C.) of her expectations for the resumption of Parliament, March 3. The NDP extended an offer to the government to restart all of the 36 bills that died on the order paper when Prime Minister Stephen Harper (Calgary Southwest, Alta.) prorogued Parliament on Dec. 30, if he agreed to reverse his decision and bring Parliament back when it was scheduled to resume, Jan. 25. In order for a bill to be restarted from where it left off it requires the unanimous consent of the House, and Ms. Davies said Mr. Harper shouldn't count on their help in getting his government's legislation through.


Libby speaking out against Conservative’s so-called “crime agenda”

Libby speaking out against Conservative’s so-called “crime agenda”

Federal Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, who is pushing the government's tough on crime agenda and plans to revive the bill on mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes in the next Parliamentary session, did not support the proposed law when he was a Mulroney backbencher. In 1988, Mr. Nicholson vice-chaired a Parliamentary committee that released a report recommending mandatory minimum sentences not be used, except in the case of repeat violent sexual offenders. The committee found, based on testimony and the U.S. experience, that the law didn't work and increases prison populations….NDP MP Libby Davies (Vancouver East, B.C.), whose party voted against Bill C-15, said Mr. Nicholson's zest for introducing mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes is purely political.


Libby making Parliament work

Libby making Parliament work

The Liberals and the NDP are working together to change the rules on Parliamentary prorogation, but Minister of State for Democratic Reform Steven Fletcher says prorogation "enhances" the ability of the government to do its job, and most Canadians don't care about this "inside baseball" controversy. Last week the Liberal and NDP House leaders and democratic reform critics met in Grit House Leader Ralph Goodale's (Wascana, Sask.) office to discuss plans to either table legislation, or change the Standing Orders in the House of Commons to limit the Prime Minister's ability to prorogue Parliament. Also in attendance were Liberal democratic reform critic Marlene Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Lachine, Que.), her NDP counterpart David Christopherson (Hamilton Centre, Ont.), and NDP House Leader Libby Davies (Vancouver East, B.C.).


Libby speaking out against Mandatory Minimum Sentences for drug crimes

Libby speaking out against Mandatory Minimum Sentences for drug crimes

OTTAWA — Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, one of Canada's most vocal champions of fixed minimum prison sentences, once opposed the idea of removing discretion for judges to sentence as they see fit. As a Tory backbencher in 1988, Nicholson was vice-chairman of a parliamentary committee that rejected the expansion of automatic incarceration, asserting that it doesn't work, overcrowds jails and takes too hefty of a social and financial toll.


Libby speaking out against Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Libby speaking out against Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Under Canada's proposed new drug laws, an 18-year-old who shares a joint with a 17-year-old friend could end up in jail. Small-time addicts convicted of pushing drugs near schools, parks, malls or other prospective youth hangouts would be automatically incarcerated for two years. Growers caught selling even one plant to a friend would also be jailed. The Harper government's bill to impose Canada's first mandatory minimum prison sentences for drug crimes — removing judges' sentencing discretion — has come under intense scrutiny in public hearings, which began last week.


NDP takes control of HoC agenda for an inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women

NDP takes control of HoC agenda for an inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women

I was proud to speak in Parliament today on the critical issue of the need for a public inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women. The NDP undertook a successful procedural maneuver and took control of the House to ensure the debate happened. It’s an issue near to my heart and something I have worked on since the 1980’s when I was City Councillor, when women in the Downtown Eastside went missing. It takes a long time for justice to happen. Please take a look at my speech.

 – Libby

Ms. Libby Davies (Vancouver East, NDP): Mr. Speaker, I would like to begin my remarks by thanking my hon. colleague for his very powerful speech. To me, and I think to all of us, it is a reminder of why we are here. We bring our personal experience and the issues that we care about. It is not just about a debating club or procedure, it is about these incredibly important issues in our society that have been buried and washed over. That is why today New Democrats are united, as the official opposition, to make sure that this debate in the House is heard and that the commitment we have made that within 100 days of becoming government we will hold a public inquiry will happen.

It took more than 20 years for the Oppal inquiry in British Columbia to happen. Going back to 1987, when I a city councillor in Vancouver and women began to go missing in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, we were always told not to worry, that there would be a case-by-case criminal investigation, very similar to what we heard from the Minister of Status of Women yesterday.

Those disappearances were never followed up and it was the families and friends of the missing women, many of whom were aboriginal and sex workers, who finally got together and said there was something horrific going on, that it was not about individual cases but about our justice system, predators, and the failure of our justice system to see these missing women as citizens and vulnerable people.

For years these disappearances were just to dealt with and it took more than 20 years until finally there was a public inquiry in Vancouver. It was not a perfect public inquiry, but it was important because it shed light and opened the door to examining some of the systemic issues that my colleague talked about.

What we are saying today is that we need to take the experience in British Columbia and understand that it is happening right across the country. It is not isolated to the Highway of Tears in northern B.C. or to Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. It is happening in Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and in Atlantic Canada.

I listened to the Minister of Status of Women yesterday talk about her action plan. I looked at that action plan and it is $2.5 million over five years to create projects and raise awareness. Awareness is important and we have show the leadership here to create that awareness, but we need to have a public inquiry to ensure that we are not just looking at individual cases but at what happened and why society as a whole failed these women, what is it that went wrong and why. Only a public inquiry can do that.

I remember meeting with the Liberal minister of justice in 1999, a couple of years after I had been elected, and explaining what had happened in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. I was shocked, because although he was sympathetic, he was actually not aware of what was going on. I realized then the tremendous amount of work that had to be done because the story was focused in Vancouver and at that point the story of what was happening across the country had not yet fully come to light. That is how long it takes.

An inquiry is important because the stories of the families need to be heard. We are talking about individual women who have been missing and murdered. We are talking about the impact on families and communities.

What I find troubling about the government’s response was said so well by Audrey Huntley, the co-founder of No More Silence. She said, in reaction to the government’s announcement, “It feels to me like it’s really laying the blame on the aboriginal community and completely ignoring stranger violence”. She went on to say, “”We need to engage Canadian society in why aboriginal women aren’t valued. That’s really what it comes down to. They’re not valued when it comes to the police investigating their cases, they’re not valued by that child welfare system and they’re not valued by their foster families, so really it’s a very deep systemic problem”. That is what Audrey Huntley had to say.

She is not the only voice to understand the depth and the horror of what is taking place, and that only a public inquiry can examine some of the systemic issues; whether it is the way policing investigations are done, whether it is contributing factors of violence and poverty and racism and the legacy of colonialism and residential schools as has been so well articulated by my colleague today.

I have to say that we were glad that a motion was passed a couple of years ago in the House to set up a special committee, but even that committee became a disappointment because, yet again, the government refused to act on the need for a national inquiry. I want to thank my colleagues: the member for Nanaimo—Cowichan, who was on that committee; the member for Churchill, who has had this file and has done so much work on calling for a national inquiry. These are contributions that we make as individual members to keep this issue alive.

So we are here today to say that we will not let this issue be swept under the carpet. We will ensure that those voices are heard. I do not believe that it will take 20 years, like it did for the Oppal commission. I believe that we will have a historic opportunity next year, in about a year, to change the government and to put in place a government that is progressive, an NDP government that actually listens to what people are saying and makes commitments to follow through on the suffering and the historic injustices of aboriginal people in this country. A public inquiry is a very key component of that.

It is not the only component. There are many things that need to be done, whether it is addressing poverty; ensuring clean water, education and housing. These are all issues that our leader, the member for Outremont, has raised in this House and has articulated. He has met with the aboriginal leadership and communities. So this is a very deep commitment that we bring, not only to this debate but to the work that we do from now, and through into the election.

I am glad we are having this debate today. It is a Friday afternoon and I know members would probably like to be home today; we would all like to be home. However, this is our place. We are here for a reason. We are here in solidarity with the organizations that have called for the national inquiry. We are here in solidarity, we are here to ensure that those voices are heard, so I am glad that we are having this debate. We will make that commitment to follow through.

I know the Conservatives do not like it, and they want to just have us contained to the little action plan that trots out. Believe me, it is just a few million dollars over five years, it is really kind of a pathetic response to a huge issue in this country. So let it be said that the Conservatives should go back, they should listen to what those families are saying and they should understand that a public inquiry, which we have the power to bring about in a timely way—not that it is the be all and the end all but is really just the beginning—is a powerful instrument to shed light on this issue and to bring justice for the missing and murdered women.

 


700 Tunnels

700 Tunnels

700 Tunnels

On our last morning in Gaza we visited the tunnels in Rafeh, a 100 meters or so from the border. Driving along a dirt road there are mounds of earth on each side and makeshift tents, each with a small group of men.

We stop and get out to look. A F16 drones above. The tunnel hole is maybe 1.2 square meters wide, reinforced with wood and drops vertically maybe 20 feet. You can barely see the man standing at the bottom in the dark. A metal hoist sits in the middle.

There were a 1000 tunnels, but bombings have reduced that number to approximately 700, we are told. The recent bombing of an adjacent tunnel has left a small crater, as evidence. We are told the tunnel sizes vary, from crawling, to crouching to walking. Some are long and take 40 plus minutes and some are short and take much less time to get through. Payment is anywhere from $500.00 to $2000 per one way trip. Not cheap but desperate times cost. Almost anything goes thru the tunnels; washing machines, cows, machinery, car parts, wedding dresses, and of course, people. There is even an oil pipeline. The Israeli’s allowed some gas to come in about a week ago, but there hasn’t been much pick up, as the tunnel price is a better deal. Even hair conditioner (one of the items banned for import into Gaza) makes it through. Local folks cannot understand why hair conditioner and Pampers aren’t allowed in “above ground”.

The tunnels are dangerous; they can cave in, and of course face bombing. The sound of an F16 passing high above, a clear reminder of the dangers of this business.

Other members of our group are very interested in the tunnels themselves, but I am interested in who controls them. This is hard to find out, and info is very vague. Various individuals “own” them, and I wish I could find out more, but there is not enough time, as we ourselves, have to get back quickly to the “other” crossing and navigate the anticipated delays there. I remember one of the Palestinian business men warning – “when you come back, I may not be here. It will be the Mafioso sitting here, not me”. He desperately wanted the tunnels gone and regular trade mechanisms set up.

So – we leave – a short but highly informative visit to Gaza and I feel that we have done what we set out to do……see the disaster first hand and help advocate for change.

Back at Rafeh we pass through the Gaza side quickly. But the Egypt side takes forever, again. It is airless, hot and dirty in the arrival hall and we wait and wait, as others do, (not because its busy, but because there are so many layers of clearance to go through), until finally our passports are stamped. Such limited access for people, into Gaza, mostly denied, is a huge issue and I’m glad we went through Rafeh to see it firsthand.

Now we begin the long drive back across the Sinai Peninsula and over the Suez Canal, back into Cairo, back to Amman, back to London, and finally to Halifax, where the NDP Convention is already underway. My brain is working hard to switch gears. Were times different, our alternative route could have been a drive of an hour or so to Tel Aviv, and a direct flight to Canada.

I would like to thank the good folks in the Canadian Mission Office in Ramallah, who provided our delegation with excellent support, information and assistance to our mission in the West Bank. They are great people! This past Canada Day, in lieu of their stat holiday, the staff in the office in Ramallah organized and worked on a big clean up and fix up of a local children’s park in Ramallah. Now that is a fine example of true Canadian friendship and support.

I must also thank CODE PINK for their wonderful help in organizing this mission. Kim, Ehab, Jase, and Sara, are terrific travel companions. This was their second, and for some, 3rd time to Gaza. They did what DFAIT wouldn’t do in Gaza, they supported our mission, made it work, got us in and out safely, and paid their own way and expected no thanks, other than a hope that this mission will draw attention and that we’ll keep the pressure up. We will.


Libby joins Vancouver rally against prorogation

Libby joins Vancouver rally against prorogation

MEDIA ADVISORY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
JANUARY 22, 2009

NDP MP LIBBY DAVIES TO JOIN VANCOUVER RALLY AGAINST PROROGATION

Vancouver – Vancouver East MP Libby Davies will join hundreds of concerned citizens at Saturday’s “Rally for Canada, Stand Up for Democracy!” protest starting at the Vancouver Art Gallery.

The Vancouver rally is one of many that will take place across Canada to protest the Conservative Government’s move to shut down Parliament by proroguing the House of Commons back in December, 2009. Participants will march from the gallery to Victory Square.

WHAT: Rally for Canada, Stand Up for Democracy!

WHEN: 1:00 PM SATURDAY, JANUARY 23

WHERE: VANCOUVER ART GALLERY to VICTORY SQUARE
(

“Hundreds of thousands of Canadians are speaking up to say they want their MPs back in the House of Commons,” said Davies. “They need help to recover from the recession, many are still struggling to find work, there is a pensions’ crisis, yet Stephen Harper chose to lock the doors of parliament instead of getting back to work.”

-30-



Top